House Rules - Revision history

Cmatney: Pushed from realm.

2021-09-27T02:19:26Z

Pushed from realm.

Cmatney: Pushed from realm.

2021-09-26T19:37:17Z

Pushed from realm.

Cmatney: Pushed from realm.

2021-09-26T18:52:30Z

Pushed from realm.

Cmatney at 14:46, 12 January 2021

2021-01-12T14:46:04Z

Cmatney at 14:45, 12 January 2021

2021-01-12T14:45:43Z

Cmatney: Pushed from realm.

2020-01-14T20:47:38Z

Pushed from realm.

Cmatney: Pushed from realm.

2020-01-14T20:45:45Z

Pushed from realm.

Cmatney: Pushed from realm.

2019-11-12T17:42:55Z

Pushed from realm.

Cmatney: Pushed from realm.

2018-09-26T06:00:16Z

Pushed from realm.

Cmatney: Pushed from realm.

2018-09-26T05:58:32Z

Pushed from realm.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:19, 27 September 2021
Line 437:		Line 437:
	</ul>		</ul>
	-->		-->
		+	== Languages ==
		+	Languages are covered in detail on the [[Languages]] page. The following languages from Savage Pathfinder are not used in the Realm: Aklo, Celestial, Gnoll, Kelish, Thassilonian, Undercommon.

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 '''2021-present'''
-Over the years, I have one major complaint about the d20 systems (including Pathfinder).  When characters get to 12th level or so, combats take too long to resolve.  An entire session can be lost to a single battle with each round of combat taking 30 minutes or more.  The newer D&D 5e and Pathfinder 2 do not solve the problem - characters still have huge sinks of hit points and many, many ways to keep filling up the pool.  Now, some folks complain about the complexity, lack of character class balance, etc. in Pathfinder.  I like complexity, and unbalanced characters are interesting and a challenge for the Dungeon Master.  But, the pace of play is too slow.
+Over the years, I have had one major complaint about the d20 systems (including Pathfinder).  When characters get to 12th level or so, combats take too long to resolve.  An entire session can be lost to a single battle with each round of combat taking 30 minutes or more.  The newer D&D 5e and Pathfinder 2 do not solve the problem - characters still have huge sinks of hit points and many, many ways to keep filling up the pool.  Now, some folks complain about the complexity, lack of character class balance, etc. in Pathfinder.  Complexity, asymmetric mechanics, and unbalanced characters are interesting and a challenge for the Dungeon Master.  But, the pace of play is too slow.
 In 2021, Paizo and Pinnacle Entertainment Group announced a new system - Savage Pathfinder.  It has the structure of Pathfinder coupled with the speed of play of Savage Worlds.  Now, I have been running The Madness using Savage Worlds rules for years.  It is the perfect system for sitting down with players of differing roleplaying backgrounds and getting stuck quickly into the game.  And, we can get through a two hour combat in thirty minutes at high levels.  I avoid change for change's sake, but every twenty years, something better comes along.  So, we are switching to Savage Pathfinder as the default for campaign-style play for the [[The Irregulars|Irregulars]].  Wish us luck.
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 == Classes ==
+As a new system, Savage Pathfinder has 11 core classes: barbarian, bard, cleric, druid, fighter, monk, paladin, ranger, rogue, sorcerer, wizard.  All of these are allowed. With the ability to use prestige edges and multiple class edges, it is easy to tailor a character to suit almost any need.  I suspect that new Savage Pathfinder publications will introduce new classes over time.  Many classes also have organizations (i.e., churches, guilds, etc.) associated with them for support, advancement and missions.  See the [[Organizations]] page for full details.
-Classes in Pathfinder are found in the ''Core Rulebook'', ''Advanced Player's Guide'', ''Advanced Class Guide'', ''Occult Adventures'', and the ''Ultimate'' books (Combat, Magic, Wilderness, Intrigue).  The only class from these books that is not allowed is the Gunslinger from ''Ultimate Combat''. With the ability to use prestige classes and multiclasses, it is easy to tailor a character to suit almost any need.
+<!-- Classes in Pathfinder are found in the ''Core Rulebook'', ''Advanced Player's Guide'', ''Advanced Class Guide'', ''Occult Adventures'', and the ''Ultimate'' books (Combat, Magic, Wilderness, Intrigue).  The only class from these books that is not allowed is the Gunslinger from ''Ultimate Combat''.
+-->
 == Races ==
-Races in Pathfinder are found in the ''Core Rulebook'' and ''Advanced Race Guide''.  I have divided these into two groups.  Player Character races are those that adventurers can choose for campaign play.  NPC races are those that either don't exist in the Realm or are limited to NPCs.  I have adopted three races from third-party content to fill some important gaps missing in the Paizo books.  Overall, this gives players a wide variety of races to play.  Also, with permission, I am always game for players exploring non-standard characters - an ogre archaeologist, a parrot illusionist, or a fairy seeking help for her queen.
+NOTE: Playing a rare race may require you to deal with significant social and roleplaying challenges in the Reaches.
 '''Allowed Player Character Races (18)'''
@@ Line 437: / Line 436: @@
 Benefit: While using Wolf Style, when you deal at least 10 points of damage to a prone opponent with a natural weapon or an unarmed strike, as a swift action you can savage that creature. When you do, your opponent must succeed at a Fortitude save (DC = 10 + half your character level + your Wisdom modifier). If the target fails the saving throw, it takes either 1d4 Charisma damage or 1d4 Constitution damage, or it becomes fatigued (your choice). Ability score damage dealt with this ability cannot equal or exceed the victim’s actual ability score total.<br>
 </ul>

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 House rules have always been a part of roleplaying for me.  While my interest has always been in storytelling (not combat simulation), I am a incorrigible tinkerer when it comes to rules.  Now, I have stripped out almost all of the rules-specific content (i.e., stat blocks) from the dungeons and adventure descriptions on this site.  This is partially because I have used several RPG game systems over the decades and it would be confusing, but mostly it is because the information doesn't really advance the story line - it merely provides mechanical support around the table.
-This page provides a single place for my thoughts on House Rules for our current rule system, Pathfinder.
+This page provides a single place for my thoughts on House Rules for our current rule system, Savage Pathfinder.
 == History of the Rules ==
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 While my first adventures were run using the white-boxed set of D&D rules, the introduction of the Player's Handbook in June 1978 shifted our gaming group to AD&D where we stayed for over twenty years.  Over time, the new AD&D books declined in quality becoming more formulaic.  By the time the Fiend Folio was published in August 1981, I was already creating house rules to handle a dynamic game.  In 1988, I published a series of rule books to normalize the AD&D system, extend the character progression to higher levels, and introduce new spells and monsters.  When D&D 2nd edition came out in 1989, we already had something better.  We still use these expanded AD&D rules at [[Matcon]] once a year with the classic campaign.
-'''2000-present'''
+'''2000-2021'''
-In 2000, I started playing with a group using the newly-released D&D 3.0 rules.  I was immediately hooked.  After playing in dozens of systems over the years, I had finally found something better than my homegrown AD&D system.  The 2003 release of D&D 3.5 continued the upward trend by fixing a few fundamental flaws of the d20 system.  In 2008, [[4th Edition D&D:  Simply Elegant or Simpleminded?|D&D 4.0]] came out.  It was terrible.  I threw the books away.  At that point, I expected to return to creating rules content myself.  But in 2009, Paizo released Pathfinder - sort of a D&D version 3.75.  It was great - deep, crunchy and well supported.  I could focus on storytelling and content, and Paizo would do the rest.  We are still playing Pathfinder as the default for campaign-style play for the [[The Irregulars|Irregulars]].
+In 2000, I started playing with a group using the newly-released D&D 3.0 rules.  I was immediately hooked.  After playing in dozens of systems over the years, I had finally found something better than my homegrown AD&D system.  The 2003 release of D&D 3.5 continued the upward trend by fixing a few fundamental flaws of the d20 system.  In 2008, [[4th Edition D&D:  Simply Elegant or Simpleminded?|D&D 4.0]] came out.  It was terrible.  I threw the books away.  At that point, I expected to return to creating rules content myself.  But in 2009, Paizo released Pathfinder - sort of a D&D version 3.75.  It was great - deep, crunchy and well supported.  I could focus on storytelling and content, and Paizo would do the rest.
-In 2018, Paizo unveiled Pathfinder 2.  The new rules do clean up some of the complexities of a rule set that has 28 books published over a decade.  But, it also focuses the game on combat simulation and attempts to simplify all the quirkiness of the rules into nice neat compartments.  In many ways, my complaints on this system are the same as my complaints about D&D 5th edition - it feels like a sanitized starter game.  As a storyteller, neither of these systems get me very excited.  I avoid change for change's sake, so my campaigns will continue to use the original Pathfinder.
+In 2014, WotC released D&D 5th Edition.  I played in a few D&D 5e games and even ran a few.  Pretty quickly, my gaming group decided the new system felt like a sanitized starter game.  Bounded stats, attuned magic items, and way too many ways to cheat death made the game safe, balanced, and boring.  In 2018, Paizo unveiled Pathfinder 2.  The new rules did clean up some of the complexities of a rule set that had 28 books published over a decade.  But, it also focused the game on combat simulation and simplified all the quirkiness of the rules into nice neat compartments.  In many ways, my complaints about this system are the same as my complaints about D&D 5th edition.  As a storyteller, neither of these systems got me very excited, so we passed.
 == It's A Dangerous World Out There ==
@@ Line 38: / Line 44: @@
 == Classes ==
-Classes in Pathfinder are found in the ''Core Rulebook'', ''Advanced Class Guide'', ''Occult Adventures'', and the ''Ultimate'' books.  The only class that is not allowed is the Gunslinger from ''Ultimate Combat''.
+Classes in Pathfinder are found in the ''Core Rulebook'', ''Advanced Player's Guide'', ''Advanced Class Guide'', ''Occult Adventures'', and the ''Ultimate'' books (Combat, Magic, Wilderness, Intrigue).  The only class from these books that is not allowed is the Gunslinger from ''Ultimate Combat''. With the ability to use prestige classes and multiclasses, it is easy to tailor a character to suit almost any need.
-Many classes have organizations associated with them for support, advancement and the like.  See the [[Organizations]] page for full details.
+Many classes have organizations (i.e., churches, guilds, etc.) associated with them for support, advancement and missions.  See the [[Organizations]] page for full details.
 == Races ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 12 January 2021
Line 431:		Line 431:
	Benefit: While using Wolf Style, when you deal at least 10 points of damage to a prone opponent with a natural weapon or an unarmed strike, as a swift action you can savage that creature. When you do, your opponent must succeed at a Fortitude save (DC = 10 + half your character level + your Wisdom modifier). If the target fails the saving throw, it takes either 1d4 Charisma damage or 1d4 Constitution damage, or it becomes fatigued (your choice). Ability score damage dealt with this ability cannot equal or exceed the victim’s actual ability score total.<br>		Benefit: While using Wolf Style, when you deal at least 10 points of damage to a prone opponent with a natural weapon or an unarmed strike, as a swift action you can savage that creature. When you do, your opponent must succeed at a Fortitude save (DC = 10 + half your character level + your Wisdom modifier). If the target fails the saving throw, it takes either 1d4 Charisma damage or 1d4 Constitution damage, or it becomes fatigued (your choice). Ability score damage dealt with this ability cannot equal or exceed the victim’s actual ability score total.<br>
	</ul>		</ul>
−
−	~~[[File:junk.jpg]]~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 12 January 2021
Line 431:		Line 431:
	Benefit: While using Wolf Style, when you deal at least 10 points of damage to a prone opponent with a natural weapon or an unarmed strike, as a swift action you can savage that creature. When you do, your opponent must succeed at a Fortitude save (DC = 10 + half your character level + your Wisdom modifier). If the target fails the saving throw, it takes either 1d4 Charisma damage or 1d4 Constitution damage, or it becomes fatigued (your choice). Ability score damage dealt with this ability cannot equal or exceed the victim’s actual ability score total.<br>		Benefit: While using Wolf Style, when you deal at least 10 points of damage to a prone opponent with a natural weapon or an unarmed strike, as a swift action you can savage that creature. When you do, your opponent must succeed at a Fortitude save (DC = 10 + half your character level + your Wisdom modifier). If the target fails the saving throw, it takes either 1d4 Charisma damage or 1d4 Constitution damage, or it becomes fatigued (your choice). Ability score damage dealt with this ability cannot equal or exceed the victim’s actual ability score total.<br>
	</ul>		</ul>
		+
		+	[[File:junk.jpg]]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 <li>Finally, just like the statement that my NPCs are better than average, they are also richer than average.  The Realm is a dangerous place and the peasants who only make 3 sp/year died off a long time ago.  Most townsfolk can make enough to feed and clothe their families, take a pint at the pub, and save a bit for a rainy day.  That's about 1 gp/day or 360 gp/year.  Now, most of this is spent living and might come in the form of barter, but townsfolk are not destitute.  The average townsfolk spends about 120 gp/year with children costing about half that.
 </ul>
 == Races ==

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 In 2000, I started playing with a group using the newly-released D&D 3.0 rules.  I was immediately hooked.  After playing in dozens of systems over the years, I had finally found something better than my homegrown AD&D system.  The 2003 release of D&D 3.5 continued the upward trend by fixing a few fundamental flaws of the d20 system.  In 2008, [[4th Edition D&D:  Simply Elegant or Simpleminded?|D&D 4.0]] came out.  It was terrible.  I threw the books away.  At that point, I expected to return to creating rules content myself.  But in 2009, Paizo released Pathfinder - sort of a D&D version 3.75.  It was great - deep, crunchy and well supported.  I could focus on storytelling and content, and Paizo would do the rest.  We are still playing Pathfinder as the default for campaign-style play.
-In 2018, Paizo unveiled Pathfinder Playtest.  The new rules do clean up some of the complexities of a rule set that has 28 books published over a decade.  But, it also focuses the game on combat simulation and attempts to simplify all the quirkiness of the rules into nice neat compartments.  In many ways, my complaints on this system are the same as my complaints about D&D 5th edition - it feels like a sanitized starter game.  As a storyteller, neither of these systems get me very excited.  I avoid change for change's sake, so my campaigns will continue to use the original Pathfinder.  I will re-evaluate the final version of the Pathfinder rules slated for release at Gencon 2019.
+In 2018, Paizo unveiled Pathfinder 2.  The new rules do clean up some of the complexities of a rule set that has 28 books published over a decade.  But, it also focuses the game on combat simulation and attempts to simplify all the quirkiness of the rules into nice neat compartments.  In many ways, my complaints on this system are the same as my complaints about D&D 5th edition - it feels like a sanitized starter game.  As a storyteller, neither of these systems get me very excited.  I avoid change for change's sake, so my campaigns will continue to use the original Pathfinder.
 == It's A Dangerous World Out There ==
@@ Line 302: / Line 302: @@
 [[File:werewolf.jpg|thumb|right|300px]]
 [[Lycan]] have become more common in the Eastern Reaches after the opening of the Wolfshaunt.
 {| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#ebd5b3;"
 |'''Lycan Racial Traits'''<br>

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 <li>In order for gold to be interesting, character's coins need to be spent on something more fulfilling than piles of potions.  I usually have a major project at the center of each campaign - a castle, ship, stronghold, or the like.  This provides a meaningful use for coins after characters have outfitted themselves with the basics.  Unlike many DMs, I allow characters to roleplay buying basic magic items.  In addition, there are a handful of trading posts that have four or five major magic items - with ties to the campaign - for sale.
 <li>I spend quite of bit of time crafting magical items that will be useful in the campaign.  As a player, I really dislike getting a pile of random magic items that are immediately sold - it just takes some of the, well, magic from fighting hard for treasure.  I know that D&D and Pathfinder rules suggest giving a party of six about 24 items per level.  I usually place about half that.  On a good adventure, the party will find most of the magic items.  Sometimes they find none.  So, my campaigns are light when you consider the sheer volume of magic, but the items tend to be more powerful and useful.
-<li>Finally, just like the statement that my NPCs are better than average, they are also richer than average.  The Realm is a dangerous place and the peasants who only make 3 sp/year died off a long time ago.  Most townsfolk can make enough to feed and clothe their families, take a pint at the pub, and save a bit for a rainy day.  That's about 1 gp/day or 360 gp/year.  Now, most of this is spent living and might come in the form of barter, but townsfolk are not destitute.  The average townsfolk spends about 120 gp/year with children about half that.
+<li>Finally, just like the statement that my NPCs are better than average, they are also richer than average.  The Realm is a dangerous place and the peasants who only make 3 sp/year died off a long time ago.  Most townsfolk can make enough to feed and clothe their families, take a pint at the pub, and save a bit for a rainy day.  That's about 1 gp/day or 360 gp/year.  Now, most of this is spent living and might come in the form of barter, but townsfolk are not destitute.  The average townsfolk spends about 120 gp/year with children costing about half that.
 </ul>